Detroit Life Insurance v. Linsenmier
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
In June, 1923, Harold J. Hartline took out a life insurance policy in the sum of $1,000 in the plaintiff company. He died on the 16th of November, 1926. ' Each of the three defendants in this case made claim to the insurance, and thereupon the plaintiff filed a bill of interpleader. The trial court found that the mother of the insured, Nora E. Ream, was entitled to the insurance. The defendant Garold W. Hartline has not appealed and therefore is eliminated from this controversy; but the defendant Cleo Linsenmier, a sister of the deceased, has appealed to this court.
Garold W. Hartline, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Quist v. Western & Southern Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Page v. BurnstineSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. O'BrienMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Downey v. HofferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- Dungan v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Margery Fisher Candler and William Wallace Candler v. Louise C. Donaldson and the Mutual Benefit Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- MacDonald v. Conservative Life Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
- McAllen State Bank v. Texas Bank & Trust CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of Grant H. Piggott, Deceased, David S. Piggott and Albert F. Piggott, Co-Administrators v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.