Marano v. Granata
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We need not now decide the interesting question discussed by the appellant, as to whether the reason given by the court below for dissolving the foreign attachment was sound or not; for whether or not, in the circumstances of this case, the plaintiff was justified in joining the principal and the agent as joint defendants in the writ, we are required to sustain the order of the court by the very recent decision of the Supreme Court in Magel v. Springs, 338 Pa. 452, 12 A. 2d 558, where it was held that an averment in the affidavit of cause of action that the defendant “is at the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Raymond v. LeishmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Kohl v. Lyons (O'malley)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Magel v. SpringsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clearfield Mining Corp. v. Berlanti, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County1946
- Worcester v. EberightPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1954