Legal Opinion

Magel v. Springs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1940No. Appeal, 13PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This appeal is from the refusal to quash a writ of foreign attachment. The statute states that “A writ of foreign attachment . . . may be issued against the real or personal estate of: (a) any person not residing within this Commonwealth ...” Section 44 of the Act of 1836, P. L. 568, as amended, 12 PS section 2891. One of the purposes of proceeding by foreign attachment is to obtain the appearance of a nonresident defendant. It is therefore necessary to aver that the defendant whose property it is proposed to attach is a nonresident. The averment in the affidavit of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Raymond v. LeishmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. McCoach v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Kohl v. Lyons (O'malley)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. McLennan v. Public Utilities Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Gilbert EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. FrankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Dulles v. DullesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Springfield Township Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API