Legal Opinion

City of Fresno v. California Highway Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1981No. Civ. 16731PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, J. *

We are called upon to interpret the meaning, scope and effect of the so-called “freeway agreements,” or contracts which the state enters into with cities pursuant to certain statutes relating to freeways. In such agreements the state, in contemplation of building a freeway which has been approved by the California Highway Commission (commission), agrees to pay for and make the necessary changes in city streets (such as overcrossings and frontage roads) while the city agrees to the closing of certain city streets and other changes in local roads to be done at state expense,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. GiminezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Asia Investment Co. v. BorowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. People Ex Rel. Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Poway Royal Mobilehome Owners Ass'n v. City of PowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API