Legal Opinion

Poway Royal Mobilehome Owners Ass'n v. City of Poway

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 2007No. D048211PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCONNELL, P. J.

This case arises from the City of Poway’s (the City) two-step plan to divest itself of ownership of the Poway Royal Mobilehome Park (the Park). The City held one hearing in which it approved resolutions allowing it to issue tax-exempt bonds and loan the proceeds to the Poway Redevelopment Agency (Redevelopment Agency) for its purchase of the Park, and the Redevelopment Agency to later loan the proceeds and resell the Park to Wakeland Housing and Development Corporation (Wakeland) or its subsidiary, on the condition that it obtain a determination of tax-exempt status…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Hardin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2011
  3. Foster Poultry Farms v. Alkar-Rapidpak-MP Equipment, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
  4. Costa Mesa City Employees' Ass'n v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Sipe v. Countrywide BankDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API