McAlmond v. City of Bremerton

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing an action to enjoin the respondent (defendant) from proceeding with the annexation of appellants’ lands.

Appellants’ five assigned errors relate to findings of fact. We find no error. The annexation proceedings are valid. We affirm.

Appellants rely on Fosburgh v. Sando, 24 Wn. (2d) 586, 166 P. (2d) 850, in support of their position that “northerly” and “easterly” indicate only general directions. That case dealt with the validity of a real-estate contract under the statute of frauds, while here we consider only what governmental agency will have…