Legal Opinion

Curtis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1949No. 32635PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The reference to Code § 26-3918 (contained in count 1 of the indictment) indicates that the State was relying upon this Code section as the basis for the crime attempted to be charged in the first count. No violation of this Code section, however, is alleged in the first count of the indictment.

The section provides as follows: “26-3918. (249 P. C.) Obtaining goods, etc., on false writings. Any person who shall designedly, by color of any counterfeit letter or writing, made in any other person’s name, of fictitious name, obtain from any person money or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Saffold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  2. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Perkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  4. Green v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  5. Sessions v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  2. Broski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Rank v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Bostic v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Mobley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API