Barron v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for forgery; from Johnson superior court—Judge Hawkins. June 1, 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtBussell, J.
The various grounds of the demurrer, and all of the grounds of the motion for a new trial, save one, are sufficiently dealt with in the first six headnotes, and need no further discussion. But we feel constrained to reverse the judgment refusing a new trial, upon the ground that the court committed error in two respects: (1) in instructing the jury as follows: “If you believe the defendant, Barron, in this case had authority to sign the name of W. B. Amason per W. H. B. to a draft or order, in payment for seed that he actually purchased, he would not be authorized to sign it to a paper of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BenditCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. WillsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
- Barfield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- International Union Bank v. National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Goucher v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
- Conley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Dexter Horton National Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.