Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Basim Haddad v. Randall S. Miller Assoc, PC

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 17, 2014No. 13-2492UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge.

Husband and wife, Basim “Paul” Had-dad and Sarena Haddad, sued law firm Randall S. Miller Associates, PC (“RSM”) in Michigan state court, alleging that RSM violated the Fair Debt Collections Practice Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692f(6)(A)' and (C), by improperly completing a fore closure by advertisement under Michigan law, Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3204. RSM removed the case to federal court and filed a Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. The district court summarily dismissed the Haddads’ complaint. For the reasons explained below, we AFFIRM.

I

Paul…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. White v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Estate of William R. Barney, J v. PNC Bank, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Perlin v. Time Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  2. Turnage v. OldhamDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2018
  3. In re ZengaBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  4. In re: Vincent ZengaBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. Terry Bernard Black and Yolanda Denise BlackUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API