Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Valkanet v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1958No. 34594PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Davis

Plaintiffs filed complaint in the circuit court of Cook County for a declaratory judgment that the frontage-consent provisions of section 136-6 of the Municipal Code of the city of Chicago- are either inapplicable or invalid; that plaintiff Beverly C. Valkanet has a legal right to a license for the maintenance of a nursing home under chapter 136 of such code, without complying with the provisions of section 136-6, upon compliance with the other provisions of the chapter; and for injunction and such other relief as may be proper. Upon hearing, the trial court entered judgment, based upon…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Concordia Collegiate Institute v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bredberg v. City of WheatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Drovers Trust & Savings Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. v. Village of Tinley ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  4. Lakin v. City of PeoriaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. David E. Shelton Productions, Inc. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API