Legal Opinion

Drovers Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1960No. 35361PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice House

Plaintiff, Drovers Trust & Savings Bank, Trustee, filed suit for a declaratory judgment that frontage-consent ordinances of the city of Chicago were invalid as applied to its property. The superior court of Cook County denied the relief prayed and certified that the validity of a municipal ordinance is involved and that the public interest requires a direct appeal to this court.

The property in question is a vacant tract located at the southwest corner of 55th- Street and South Kenneth Avenue in Chicago upon which plaintiff desires to erect a gasoline filling station, including a wash and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Friend v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Koos v. SaundersIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Valkanet v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bredberg v. City of WheatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hornstein v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Cary v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Malito v. MarcinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Village of LombardIllinois Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API