State v. Williams-Bey
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtLavine, J.
In recent years, the United States and Connecticut Supreme Courts have made major changes in the jurisprudence relating to juvenile sentencing. The law now requires that juvenile offenders facing life without parole or its functional equivalent are entitled to individual consideration that takes into account the mitigating factors of their youth. This case concerns the important question of where such consideration must be given for juvenile offenders who were sentenced prior to the recent developments in the law. Must it be in the context of a resentencing proceeding, as the defendant…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Pepper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. RoblesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- State v. Williams-BeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.