Legal Opinion

State v. Rivera

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 17, 2017No. AC40218PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDiPENTIMA, C.J.

*245 The defendant, Jose Rivera, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion to correct an illegal sentence. We are asked to determine whether our state constitution affords greater protection to juvenile homicide offenders than that provided under the federal constitution. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court erred in dismissing the motion to correct an illegal sentence on the ground that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction, (2) the court erred in dismissing the motion to correct an illegal sentence because the mandatory minimum sentence of twenty-five…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burrell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  2. State v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. State v. Gang JinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. State v. McCleeseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  5. State v. ColtherstConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API