Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2018No. 94020-7PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

*1183*588¶ 1 This case addresses the adequacy of the parole remedy available under ROW 9.94A.730, the Miller1 "fix" statute. Consistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed. 2d 599 (2016), we hold that RCW 9.94A.730 's parole provision is an adequate remedy for a Miller violation, rendering unnecessary the resentencing of a defendant who long ago received a de facto life sentence as a juvenile.

FACTS

¶ 2 Jai'Mar Scott was convicted by a jury in 1990 of first degree premeditated murder for killing his neighbor, a 78-year-old-woman who…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re Pers. Restraint of Light-RothWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In re Pers. Restraint of AliWashington Supreme Court · 2020
  3. In re Pers. Restraint of BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Personal Restraint Petition Of: Gail Ann BrashearCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. State Of Washington v. Anthony Thomas WallerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API