Legal Opinion

Gonser v. Continental Casualty Co.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided September 27, 2007No. 3:06CV00186-WRWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WM. R. WILSON, Jr., District Judge.

Pending is Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Benefits and Penalty, 1 Separate Defendants Continental Casualty Company’s, CNA Group Life Assurance Company’s, and The Hartford’s (“insurance defendants”) Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings, 2 and Separate Defendant Vulcan Materials Company’s (“Vulcan”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. 3 Each party filed responses. 4

This is an ERISA claim for benefits under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a), (e)(1), and (f), and for penalties under 29 U.S.C. § 1105(a) and (b). Vulcan is Plaintiffs employer and the plan…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Jorge Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education and Ted Sanders, in His Official Capacity as Illinois State Superintendent of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Hamm v. Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API