Legal Opinion

United States v. General Motors Corporation, a Corporation. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Brock Adams

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 18, 1977No. 75-1751, 75-1752PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The facts and circumstances surrounding this case are fully stated in the dissent. While the court agrees with much of Judge LeventhaTs scholarly opinion, we believe that the Government’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted by the District Court, not only on the issue whether a defect existed in the steering pitman arm of the 1959-60 model Cadillac automobiles, but also on the issue whether the defect was related to motor vehicle safety. The evidence is uncontradicted that General Motors sold six times as many pitman arm replacements for the 1959-60 Cadillac models as for…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Andrew Corporation v. Gabriel Electronics, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Aqua Slide 'N' Dive Corp. v. Consumer Product Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Snyder v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. Smith v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  5. Bussian v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API