Legal Opinion
Bussian v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided January 24, 2006No. 1:004 CV 387PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
OSTEEN, District Judge.
The court has before it this Standing Order 30 case in which the Magistrate Judge entered an order and recommendation. Plaintiff timely objected to the recommendation and Defendants responded.
Plaintiff filed a motion for stay of the order and recommendation to allow review of the objections by the District Court Judge. Defendants 1 consented to the motion for stay. Magistrate Judge Sharp granted the stay until such time as the outstanding objections are reviewed and ruled upon by the District Court Judge.
The record has been reviewed by this court, and it is the…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Dino Cinel v. Harry F. Connick, Individually and as District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Dewey v. VOLKSWAGEN AGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Kelly v. Georgia-Pacific LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
- In re Myford Touch Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Smith v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.