Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Jefferson-Lewis-Hamilton-Herkimer-Oneida BOCES & JLHHO BOCES Professional Ass'n
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 29, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: The parties entered into a collective bargaining agreement covering the period from July 1, 1991 through June 30, 1992 that required BOCES to contribute 100% of the health insurance premium for teachers who retired on or after July 1, 1991 with at least 15 years of service. Before 1991 BOCES had contributed 100% of the health insurance premium for retirees. During July 1992, after expiration of that agreement, BOCES determined that retired teachers and active teachers would be required to contribute by paying a 10% increase in the health…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Incorporated Village of Lynbrook v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re the Arbitration Between Niagara Wheatfield Administrators Ass'n & Niagara Wheatfield Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lippman v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re the Arbitration Between Corinth Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Arbitration Between Jefferson-Lewis-Hamilton-Herkimer-Oneida BOCES, & Jefferson-Lewis-Hamilton-Herkimer-Oneida BOCES Professional Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Chenango Forks Central School District v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Chenango Forks Central School District v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012