Legal Opinion
Lippman v. Board of Education
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 26, 1985PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Meyer, J.
Health insurance benefits are not within the protection of article V, section 7 of the State Constitution, and on the facts of this case there was no contract, express or implied, by respondent Board of Education not to reduce its contribution to payment of health insurance premiums of retired employees and their dependents. There should, therefore, be an affirmance, without costs.
I
Article 11 of the Civil Service Law authorizes the establish*316ment of a State health insurance plan and section 163 of that law authorizes the inclusion in the plan of employees and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Cook v. City of BinghamtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Birnbaum v. New York State Teachers Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Sgaglione v. LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Kleinfeldt v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kanerva v. WeemsIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
- Colorado Springs Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 5 v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- McDermott v. McDermottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Ballentine v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.