Legal Opinion

Lidogoster v. Krasnerman

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Charles H. Cohen, J.

In this action instituted by the service of a summons with a notice (CPLR 305, subd [b]) stating that the “nature of this action is damages for interference with contractual relations; fraud”, plaintiffs have made a motion for an order pursuant to CPLR 6301 et seq. enjoining and restraining the defendant Mikhail Krasnerman from “contacting, approaching and/or soliciting any of the clients of the plaintiffs herein”. Plaintiffs base their action upon regulation No. 60 (11 NYCRR part 51) of the Insurance Department which sets forth certain procedures to be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Capital Telephone Co. v. Pattersonville Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Albini v. Solork AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  3. Hubbell v. Trans World Life Ins. Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Cohen v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Picotte Realty, Inc. v. Gallery of Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API