West Penn Power Company, a Corporation v. Russell Train, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency of Theunited States of America
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal challenges a June 19, 1974, district court order dismissing West Penn Power Company’s amended complaint for lack of jurisdiction.1 The dismissed complaint sought injunctive and declaratory relief protecting West Penn from any duty to comply with the particulate and sulfur compound emission standards established as part of Pennsylvania’s implementation plan2 pursuant *305to the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1857 et seq.3
West Penn did not file a petition for review under 42 U.S.C. § 1857h-5(b)(l)4 to challenge the implementation plan when it was…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Kennecott Copper Corporation, Nevada Mines Division, McGill Nevada v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Viviana Munoz-Mendoza v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Solar Turbines Inc. v. SeifCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.