Legal Opinion
Viviana Munoz-Mendoza v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 20, 1983No. 82-1706PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREYER,
Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in this suit are several minority residents of Boston’s South End, South Cove, and Chinatown neighborhoods, and a Chinatown neighborhood association. In essence, they seek judicial review of a “final agency action,” 5 U.S.C. § 704, the decision of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to grant $19 million to the City of Boston to help develop the Copley Place commercial complex. The plaintiffs argue that the decision is unlawful because HUD failed to follow proper procedures in approving the grant. In particular, they assert that certain…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- United States of America v. Avx Corporation, National Wildlife Federation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Idaho Conservation League v. MummaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Boston & Maine Corporation v. Town of HamptonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- N.A.A.C.P., Boston Chapter v. Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.