Legal Opinion
Citizens for Responsibility v. Lane County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 30, 2006No. 2005-082; A132091PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEITS, J. pro tempore
Lane County seeks review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision remanding the county’s approval of a special use permit for a firearms training facility for further proceedings consistent with LUBA’s understanding of ORS 197.770. We reverse and remand LUBA’s decision.
Before addressing the merits of the county’s challenge to LUBA’s decision, we consider whether the county has standing to bring this review proceeding. If the county lacks standing to seek review, this court does not have jurisdiction to review LUBA’s decision. As we held in Utsey v. Coos County, 176…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- MacPherson v. Department of Administrative ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Ochoco Construction, Inc. v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Bergford v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Glossip v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- Citizens for Responsibility v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- Lozano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013