Legal Opinion · Dissent

Graff v. Robert M. Swendra Agency, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 2011No. A09-0173Published

1DissentDietzen, Justice

Today, the majority establishes a new cause of action for the negligent procurement of insurance coverage that may be brought by an insured person against an insurance agent. In doing so, the majority offers no legal basis for recognizing a new cause of action for negligent procurement. Because I conclude that the new cause of action established by the majority is contrary to our existing precedent, I respectfully dissent.

Previously, this court has concluded that the promises of an insurance agent are binding on the insurance company, and that an insurance agent has no liability for those…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Western & Southern Life Insurance v. ValeIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Johnson v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank of BalatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API