Legal Opinion
Brannin v. Richardson
Texas Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1916No. 2457PublishedCited by 39 opinions
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, in an appeal from Eastland County. Brannin and another sued Richardson and others and, recovering less than claimed, appealed, and on affirmance obtained writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Yartis
The issues in this case are disclosed by the very clear statement of the case which was made by the honorable Court of Civil Appeals. (148 S. W., 348.) We quote therefrom as follows:
“L. E. Brannin and C. P. Brannin instituted this suit against Barton M. Richardson, Catherine Richardson, A. B. Teston and E. L. Teston to recover upon a number of vendor’s lien notes alleged to have been acquired by L. B. Rivers, deceased, of whose will the plaintiffs had been duly appointed executors. There was a prayer for foreclosure of the vendor’s lien upon the land described in the petition and for which it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hill v. HoeldtkeTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Spann v. Cochran & EwingTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Johns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- First National Bank of Eagle Lake v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- F. R. Hernandez Construction & Supply Co. v. National Bank of Commerce of BrownsvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Tsesmelis v. Sinton State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Chapman v. CrichetTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Allen v. TraylorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Gardner v. Associates Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.