Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Crichet

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1936No. 6668PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge SMEDLEY,

of the Commission of Appeals, delivered the opinion for the court.

On trial without a jury in district court judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs in error against defendant in error and A. R. McMahon jointly and severally for the amount of the principal, interest and attorney’s fees due on five negotiable promissory notes, each in the sum of $500.00, and for foreclosure of a deed of trust lien on a tract of land in El Paso County. On appeal by defendant in error only the Court of Civil Appeals reformed the judgment of the district court by eliminating the part of it…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Holland v. NimitzTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hill v. HoeldtkeTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Miller v. HodgesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  4. Otto v. Halff & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Martin v. DialTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Schwab v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Villarreal v. Laredo National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  3. Hunt v. Wichita County Water Improvement District No. 2Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Inwood National Bank v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee and U.S. Trust Bank, Bank of America Private Wealth Management, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
  5. C. & G. Coin Meter Supply Corp. v. First National Bank in ConroeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API