Montgomery City Lines, Inc. v. Scott
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
The appeal is from a judgment granting plaintiff a new trial, based on the giving of an erroneous charge requested by defendant, Montgomery City Lines, Inc.
The charge (12) is: “The Court charges' the jury that it was the duty of the plaintiff in walking upon or across the street at the time and place of the accident, herself to use due care and caution to avoid injury and to be on the lookout for moving vehicles approaching, and if she negligently and thoughtlessly walked into the side of the moving bus, or in front of and in dangerous proximity to the moving bus, and thereby…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Shipp v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Sullivan v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Adler v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Western Steel Car & Foundry Co. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lawson v. General Telephone Company of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Tyler v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Louisville & Nashville RR v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Herrington v. Central Soya Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Smith v. LilleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.