Legal Opinion
Harmon & Regalia, Inc. v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 21, 1955PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified so as to provide for interest to run against defendant, the City of New York, from January 18, 1950, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to the respondent. On the evidence, the jury could reasonably have resolved the issue of negligence and contributory negligence in favor of plaintiff as against all defendants. The trial court properly allowed interest to plaintiff, as a matter of law. Such an allowance has been recognized in an action for injury to property through negligence (Flamm v. Noble, 296 N. Y. 262, 269; Squibb & Sons Inter-Amer. Corp. v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Flamm v. NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Rapid Transit Subway Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- E. R. Squibb & Sons Inter-American Corp. v. Springmeier Shipping Co.New York Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,479 Samuel Mallis and Franklyn B. Kupferman, Cross-Appellants v. Bankers Trust Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Newburgh Land & Dock Company v. The Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Delulio v. 320-57 Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Mount Sinai Hospital v. Borg-Warner Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Sandak v. CombsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.