Legal Opinion

Newburgh Land & Dock Company v. The Texas Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 7, 1955No. 67, Docket 23637PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAND, Circuit Judge.

The defendant appeals from so much of a judgment as allowed interest upon the verdict of a jury from the time when the loss occurred instead of from the entry of the judgment. The issue arose in the following way. The plaintiff, a-New York corporation, sued the defendant, a Delaware corporation, in the District Court to recover damages for injuries to its “floating dock,” moored in the Hudson River at Newburgh, New York, caused by the negligent navigation of the defendant’s tug and barges. The case was tried to a jury before Ryan, J., and the jury brought in a verdict of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. John Furtado v. Harold Bishop, John Furtado v. Harold BishopCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  2. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. Earl E. Robinson v. Pocahontas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  4. Sebastian Scola v. Boat Frances, R., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  5. Felix Canova v. The Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API