Legal Opinion
Sandak v. Combs
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided February 3, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
After assessment of damages in a property damage action arising out of a collision between two automobiles, judgment was found in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $1,568.30, the amount demanded in the summons and complaint. Interest was not included in the recovery and hence the Clerk of the court refused to allow interest to be entered on the judgment. A motion was made by plaintiff to direct the Clerk of the court to enter interest on the judgment from the time of the occurrence. The motion was granted and judgment was thereafter entered to include interest.
In Flamm v. Noble (296 N. Y. 262,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Flamm v. NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Wilson v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Harmon & Regalia, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mount Sinai Hospital v. Borg-Warner Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Purcell v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Purcell v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1961