Legal Opinion
State v. Doe
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 16, 1977No. 2983PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
The child was adjudicated a delinquent child in need of care or rehabilitation. The Children’s Court found the child to have intentionally received or retained stolen property contrary to § 40A-16-11(A), N.M. S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6, 1972, Supp.1975) with a value of less than $100.00 — a petty misdemeanor. This was a delinquent act. Section 13-14-3(N), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 3, pt. 1, 1976). Cf. Doe v. State, 88 N.M. 627, 545 P.2d 93 (Ct.App.1976). However, had the crime been committed by an adult, jurisdiction would have been in the magistrate court. Section 36-3-4,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Peyton v. NordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Hamilton v. WalkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Pineda v. Grande Drilling Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. PearsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. MontanoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- Roberts v. RichardsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.