Legal Opinion

Cloud v. Bushnell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1964No. 1313PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an application to our supervisory jurisdiction praying for rescission and annulment of an interlocutory preliminary injunction granted by the trial court.

The relator had unsuccessfully attempted to intervene in the injunction suit. Following the granting of the preliminary injunction, the relator had intervened in the suit as an interested party, and had then unsuccessfully moved to dissolve the injunction.

Relator or no other party sought, to appeal within the fifteen-day delay applicable to orders or judgments relating to-interlocutory preliminary injunctions, LSA-C.C.P. Art. 3612.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Borah v. DusselSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Warren v. Malvina Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  3. State ex rel. Duhé v. RostSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cloud v. DyessLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Triche v. City of HoumaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Cloud v. BushnellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Zbozen v. Department of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. State v. SignalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API