Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Duhé v. Rost

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 15, 1889No. 10,424PublishedCited by 3 opinions

y^PPLIC A.TION for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

McEnery, J.

The relator, administrator of the succession of G-uillaunre Duhé, represents that in the matter of said succession the district judge rendered a judgment sustaining the opposition to the account filed by her and dismissed the account because it was not restated as directed by this court in the case of this succession reported in 41 Ann. 209. That she applied for a suspensive appeal from said judgment which was granted, and the bond fixed at $1500 which is excessive, a bond covering costs being sufficient. The respondent judge while giving no…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Borah v. DusselSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Cloud v. BushnellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Rosenthal-Brown Fur Co. v. Jones-Frere Fur Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API