Legal Opinion

Borah v. Dussel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 29, 1922No. 25682PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.

Relators pray for a writ of mandamus to compel the judge of the civil district court to grant them a suspensive appeal from a judgment declaring that one of them, Dussel, was not competent or eligible to be surety on a 12-months bond tendered by Castell. The bond was offered to secure the price of property that had been seized under a final judgment against Dussel and was adjudicated to Castell. The price of the adjudication was not near enough to satisfy the judgment against Dussel; which fact, however, is a matter of no importance. The sheriff, of course, refused to accept the insolvent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Crescent City Bank v. Judge of the Third District Court of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1865
  2. Gallier v. GarciaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
  3. State ex rel. Duhé v. RostSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  4. State ex rel. Geddes v. Judge of Civil District Court for the Parish of OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Triche v. City of HoumaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Morris v. Transtates Petroleum, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Cloud v. BushnellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Rosenthal-Brown Fur Co. v. Jones-Frere Fur Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  5. State v. SignalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API