Borah v. Dussel
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.
Relators pray for a writ of mandamus to compel the judge of the civil district court to grant them a suspensive appeal from a judgment declaring that one of them, Dussel, was not competent or eligible to be surety on a 12-months bond tendered by Castell. The bond was offered to secure the price of property that had been seized under a final judgment against Dussel and was adjudicated to Castell. The price of the adjudication was not near enough to satisfy the judgment against Dussel; which fact, however, is a matter of no importance. The sheriff, of course, refused to accept the insolvent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Crescent City Bank v. Judge of the Third District Court of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1865
- Gallier v. GarciaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
- State ex rel. Duhé v. RostSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
- State ex rel. Geddes v. Judge of Civil District Court for the Parish of OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
3Cited by5 opinions
- Triche v. City of HoumaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Morris v. Transtates Petroleum, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Cloud v. BushnellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Rosenthal-Brown Fur Co. v. Jones-Frere Fur Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- State v. SignalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971