Legal Opinion

Cardoner v. Day

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided January 25, 1918No. 680PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Mathilde Cardoner against Eugene R. Day and others.

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, District Judge.

Plaintiff pra}>s for a rescission of the sale by her to certain of the defendants of her one-sixteenth undi*573vidcd interest in the Hercules mine, one of the large operating lead properties in Shoshone county, Idaho. The sale was definitely^ agreed upon October 28, 1916, at which time a part of the consideration was paid and the deed executed, and the balance of the consideration was paid and the deed delivered on November 14, 1916. Pursuant to the direction of defendant Eugene R. Day, to whom, through the agency of defendant Allen, the plaintiff negotiated the sale, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Hammond v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. Patrick v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Morffew v. S.F. & San Rafael R.R.California Supreme Court · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walter v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Wells v. WoodOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Reed v. RobilioDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1967
  4. Reed v. RobilioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. Ohaco Sheep Co., Inc. v. Heirs of OhacoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API