Legal Opinion

Reed v. Robilio

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 17, 1968No. 18326PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN W. PECK, Circuit Judge.

In 1961, plaintiff-appellant brought this derivative action on behalf of the estate of her deceased parents alleging that defendants, as partners in the Memphis, Tennessee, partnership of Robilio & Cuneo, breached the fiduciary obligation owed the estate of her father. He had been a partner of the firm, and a breach of the fiduciary obligations owed *732her mother, who had also been a partner, was also alleged. Subsequent to trial, the cause was dismissed for lack of diversity jurisdiction and plaintiff appealed. This court reversed and remanded for a decision on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Turner v. LeathersTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. The Associated Press v. Taft-Ingalls Corporation, Formerly Known as the Cincinnati Times-Star CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  4. Malden Trust Co. v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Tennant v. DunlopSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walter v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Reed v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  3. Longo v. McLaren (In Re McLaren)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
  4. Reed v. RobilioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,344Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API