Legal Opinion
In re 188 Randolph Bldg. Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 1, 1945No. 8921PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner asks leave of this court to appeal from an order of the District Court, pursuant to section 250 of chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 650. The order was entered August 22, 1945, and denied petitioner’s claim for services alleged to have been performed by him in this proceeding and which he alleges were valuable and beneficial to the estate. In passing upon this claim the District Court said: “Meyer Abrams has asked for an allowance as representing certain creditors. Unfortunately Mr. Abrams owned certain bonds of the debtor and sold them while…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Mountain States Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Otis & Co. v. Insurance Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- In re Reynolds Investing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- In Re Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1941
- In re Seville Court Apartments Building Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In The Matter Of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul And Pacific Railroad Co., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- In Re Equitable Office Bldg. CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Stickney Corp. v. Chicago Milwaukee Corp. (In re Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988