Legal Opinion
In re Reynolds Investing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 3, 1942No. 7965PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The case at bar is an appeal by Messrs. Wickersham and Wickersham, attorneys-at-law of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, from an order, of the court below dismissing their application for allowance of compensation and reimbursement of expenses in connection with the reorganization of Reynolds Investing Company, Inc. The District Court found that the services of the petitioners were of benefit to the estate of the debtor but held that Section 249 of Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act as *61amended, 11 U.S.C.A. § 649,1 prohibited payment of compensation to the firm and reimbursement of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Mountain States Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Otis & Co. v. Insurance Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Midland United Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- In Re Midland United Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1946
- Young v. PottsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- In Re Cosgrove-Meehan Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- In Re Central States Electric Corp. (Two Cases). Petition of Henis Petition of O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.