Legal Opinion
In Re Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 8, 1941No. 31352PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JENNEY, District Judge.
We have before us for consideration the petition of Messrs. Faries and McDowell, attorneys, for an allowance on account of fees in this proceeding in the amount of $31,415. The petition for, continuance heretofore filed is 'denied.
Reference is made to the stipulation of facts and the summary of evidence, on file herein, for a detailed statement of the facts. Briefly, the established facts are as follows: Petitioner is a law partnership, composed of David R. Faries and Charles E. McDowell, as general partners, and Clifford Argue and McIntyre Faries, as junior partners. A…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Jackson v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- In Re Martin Custom Made Tires CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wolf v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- In Re Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1941
- In Re Equitable Office Bldg. CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Matter of Searles Castle Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981
- In re 188 Randolph Bldg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.