Legal Opinion
Baltimore & O. R. v. United States
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 24, 1933No. 4681PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a representative action brought by a number of the leading railroads of the United States, and in the interest of substantially all of the steam operated carriers of the country, to enjoin the enforcement by the Interstate Commerce Commission of amendments supplementary to its rule 157, ordered by the commission in January of this year, after a very extensive hearing, and on the joint complaint of the chief engineer of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, and the president of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen. 190 Interstate Commerce Commission Reports, 351.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- United States v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Inland Motor Freight v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1941
- Thomson v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.