Legal Opinion

Cherry Hill Gold Mining Co. v. Baker

California Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1905No. Sac. No. 1140PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County modifying a preliminary injunction. J. S. Beard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The court having granted a preliminary injunction upon the verified complaint of plaintiff, subsequently, upon the ex parte application of defendants, modified this injunction in important particulars. The appeal is from this latter order, and involves the single question as to the power of the court so to do, without notice to plaintiff. This question must be considered as definitively settled in favor of appellant by the cases of Hefflon v. Bowers, 72 Cal. 270, [13 Pac. 690], and Page v. Vaughn, 133 Cal. 335, [65 Pac. 740]. In the latter case it is said: “The evident purpose of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hefflon v. BowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Page v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chico Feminist Women's Health Center v. ScullyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. MALATKA v. HelmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API