Legal Opinion

Page v. Vaughn

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1901No. L.A. No. 830PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This is an appeal from an order dissolving an injunction.

The plaintiff alleged in his verified complaint that he and the defendant M. L. Vaughn were each owners of an undivided one-half interest in a certain mining claim situated in Kern County; that investigation had demonstrated that the ores in said mine could not be extracted, shipped, and treated in any mill available for that purpose without great waste and loss, and for that reason, on a certain day, plaintiff notified defendants that he would not then engage in working said mine, nor become a partner with them for that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hefflon v. BowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cherry Hill Gold Mining Co. v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API