Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Rural/Metro Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided November 13, 1997No. 14-96-01079-CVPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONEILL, Justice.

Camelia Joyce Schultz, representative of the Estate of Philip M. Farr (“Schultz”), appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Rural/Metro Corporation of New Mexico—Texas d/b/a American Medical Transport (“AMT”), in a negligence action. Schultz contends the trial court erred in applying the absolute two-year limitations period contained in the Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act (hereinafter “article 4590i”) because (1) the statute does not apply to her negligence claims, (2) the summary judgment proof was inadequate to show that AMT was a “health…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Delgado v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Anderson v. SniderTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Thompson v. SchmittTexas Supreme Court · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Happy Industrial Corp. v. American Specialties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  2. Royal Mortgage Corp. v. MontagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Elite Towing, Inc. v. LSI Financial Group, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  4. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Benchmark Electronics, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  5. Lyons v. Lindsey Morden Claims Management, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API