Legal Opinion
Sharar v. Pollia
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 12, 1951No. 4230_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
This was an action by Andrew A. Pollia and six use plaintiffs, one of whom was appellant, J. A. Sharar, brought in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming against E. C. Nickel, a base contractor, and the Federal Public Housing Authority, to recover for work done and materials furnished under subcontracts with the base contractor. On a former appeal, see Nickel v. Pollia, 10 Cir., 179 F.2d 160, the judgment was reversed and the cause was remanded with directions to determine the issues in light of the opinion. On the second hearing, the trial court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Huron Holding Corp. v. Lincoln Mine Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wallace v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Enos v. KeatingWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
- Nickel v. PolliaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Joseph P. Jenkins v. Honorable Zita L. Weinshienk, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Donaldson, Hoffman & Goldstein v. John J. Gaudio, Trustee, Matter of Forrest A. Heath Company, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. ApodacaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Forrest A. Heath Co. v. Donaldson, Hoffman & GoldsteinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1958
- Brown v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.