Legal Opinion

Forrest A. Heath Co. v. Donaldson, Hoffman & Goldstein

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided February 17, 1958No. 18492PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARRAJ, District Judge.

This is a petition for review of the findings and order of the Referee in Bankruptcy allowing the claim of Donaldson, Hoffman and Goldstein as an attorney’s lien.

Separate petitions for review of that order were filed by the trustee and by the United States, a creditor.

At the opening of the hearing, claimant moved in open court to dismiss the petition for review of the United States on the grounds that a petition for review could only be filed by the trustee. The Court reserved its ruling on that motion.

Although the Court’s decision on the basic issue in this case makes…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Upshur County v. RichSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Fillmore v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  5. Collins v. ThuringerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ranes v. Molen (In Re Ranes)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  2. In Re Printcrafters, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1997
  3. In the Matter of Sunningdale Country Club, Bankrupt. Irving Miller and Sarah Miller v. Robert S. Gosline, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  4. Bender & Treece, P.C. v. Storage Technology Corp. (In Re Storage Technology Corp.)District Court, D. Colorado · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API