Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'n v. Adams

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is earnestly urged that the court erred in refusing to grant the continuance and in striking out the defense of the limitation of the amount that could he recovered under the policy for death resulting from a discharge of a firearm, unless shown to be accidental by an eye-witness of the transaction other than the insured or beneficiary.

It will suffice to say, in answer to the assignment of error for denying the motion for a postponement, that this motion also disclosed that there were no witnesses to the killing of the insured except Giles, who, it was…