Fore v. New York Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Dissent
Smi^h, J.,
(dissenting). Although it is my opinion that the Robbs case, cited and relied upon by the majority for the reversal of the judgment of the circuit court, is unsound in logic and contrary to the overwhelming weight of authority, I do not write this dissenting opinion to criticise that case. I accept it as declaring the law, and it is my purpose only to attempt to show that it does not apply to the policy here sued on.
Upon the authority of the Robbs case, it may be assumed that, as the provision against suicide does not appear in the incontestable clause in the policy sued upon, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scarborough v. American National InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Myers v. Liberty Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Childress v. Fraternal Union of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Stean v. Occidental Life Ins.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- Howard v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.