Davis v. Lynham
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The plaintiff has filed a motion in this case to strike the bill of exceptions on the ground that the same was not presented for allowance or settlement within the time required by our statute. The record shows that the appellants did not present their proposed bill of exceptions for settlement until about three or four days after, under the provisions of our statute, it should have been presented for allowance and settlement. Before presenting the bill, however, appellants, through their counsel, served notice upon plaintiff’s attorneys that counsel at a day named in the notice would apply…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Holmes v. JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Rydalch v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Young v. HylandUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Moyer v. LangtonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Tanner v. StrattonUtah Supreme Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brown v. MillinerUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- George B. Leavitt Co. v. CouturierUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Báez García v. TrifonaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
- Nelson v. Da Rouch Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1935
- Jenkins v. StephensUtah Supreme Court · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.