Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Da Rouch Et Ux.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1935No. 5553PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

This appeal involves a boundary line dispute. The proceeding is in equity. The property is located in the westerly portion of Murray City, Salt Lake county, Utah.

Appellant asserts the boundary in dispute along the north of her property except for a small angle to the north at the west end of the strip of land in dispute to be controlled by survey and record title. The survey establishing the boundary claimed to be the correct one was made in November, 1932.

Respondents contend that the boundry line in dispute is governed and controlled by existing fence lines and practical…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tripp v. BagleyUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Holmes v. JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Rydalch v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Young v. HylandUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Moyer v. LangtonUtah Supreme Court · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. MillinerUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Fuoco v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Hales v. FrakesUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Beckman v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. DaRouch v. District Court of Third Judicial District Ex Rel. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API