Legal Opinion

Huffman v. Copeland

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9592Published

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion

On Petition for a Rehearing.

Woods, C. J.

A rehearing is asked because it was not decided “ whether the deed was delivered to the appellee Margaret, Jr., prior to the rendition of appellant’s judgment,” nor “ the effect thereof in case it was not so delivered.”

When the conclusion was reached that the contract for the conveyance rested upon a valuable consideration, and was therefore valid and binding, it became immaterial whether or not there was a delivery of the deed before the rendition of the judgment. The contract having been made and the consideration paid or executed, a conveyance under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Busenbarke v. RameyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Tuttle v. ChurchmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Flanders v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Wainwright v. FlandersIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Armstrong v. FearnawIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API